|  In Class:Question to PonderHow likely is it that in the next thirty years the Earth will be hit
by an impactor like the one that hit Siberia in 1908?
 a) not very likely
 b) pretty likely
 c) almost a certainty
 d) we have no idea
 
 
 
 Philosophical Considerations
 We have always thought about the Earth as unique.
 It took time for people to realize that it was just one of many planets 
circling the Sun and therefore nothing particularly special.
 More recently, it was accepted that the Sun might be the only star with 
planets surrounding it.
 In the last thirty years, people have begun to consider the possibility 
that all stars might have planetary systems.
 Measuring the presence of planets has only become possible in the last ten 
years.
 
 
 
 Direct Detection of Extrasolar Planets
 Extremely difficult for two reasons:
 Stars are really far away, and so the angular separation between star and 
any orbiting planet is very small.
 Planets are far dimmer than their parent stars.
 These two effects combine to make it impossible to see an extrasolar planet 
directly with today's technology (though see this press
release claiming a direct detection (sort of..))
 
 
 
  Detecting a Planet's Influence on the Star Though Proper Motion Studies
Just as the star exerts a gravitational tug on the orbiting planet (that's 
why the planet orbits the star afterall), so too does the planet pull on the star.
 Result is that both star and planet together orbit around their
center of mass.
 Distance between each object and the center of mass is inversely related to 
the object's mass:Rstar/Rplanet = Mplanet/Mstar
 (See Lab #9 for more explanation.)
 Therefore, the star should appear to wobble back and forth in the sky.
 We might be able to detect this motion with careful measurements of the 
star's position over a long time.
 This method works for binary star systems, where two stars orbit around one 
another. Each star is massive enough to make the other one wobble significantly.
 Unfortunately, because planets are much less massive than stars, the wobble 
induced in the motion of a single star by an orbiting planet is tiny.
 No one has conclusively detected the presence of a planet using this 
technique.
 
 
 
 Detecting a Planet's Influence on the Velocity of a Star
 The wobble induced in the motion of a star by a planet means that the star 
moves in a little circle about the center of mass of the star/planet system.
 Sometimes the star is moving toward us, sometimes away from us.
 We can use the Doppler Effect to measure the speed of the star and 
whether it's moving toward or away from us.
 The Doppler Effect states that the wavelengths of the light emitted by the 
star will change slightly depending on whether the star is moving toward us (waves "smooshed together") or away from us (waves "stretched out").
 The quantitative relationship can be found in Lab #9.
 Observationally, we look for a star whose velocity oscillates back and forth 
with time.
 First detection was made in 1995.
 Evidence for 160 planets orbiting other stars has been found using this 
method (as of September 2005).
 
 
 
 The Planets Found So Far
 Different from planets in our Solar System.
 Mostly very massive (as massive of more massive than Jupiter).
 Mostly in orbits very close to the parent star (e.g., < 1 A.U.)
 This is probably a selection effect (these kinds of planets in these 
kinds of orbits produce the largest velocity signatures).
 However, it calls into the question the idea that massive gas giant planets 
can only form far from the star, where it's cold enough for ices to accumulate.
 Is there another way to form massive planets?
 Or did this planets form in the outer reaches of their solar systems, and 
then migrate inwards?
 The second possibility suggests that these planetary systems might not be 
dynamically stable.
 |